<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aimClear® Search Marketing Blog &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aimclearblog.com/category/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com</link>
	<description>Online marketing blog for advertising agency, in-house &#38; PR professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Panama Click Source Quality Tweaks</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/06/05/panama-content-match-source-quality-tweaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/06/05/panama-content-match-source-quality-tweaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marty Weintraub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paid Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/06/05/panama-content-match-source-quality-tweaks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers quip about “selling the other party a vest with no arms,” which means ceding the opposition a settlement solution which sounds accommodating but gives up little. Yesterday’s Yahoo Search Marketing announcement regarding discounted PPC click-throughs for low value traffic could be just that. The source quality tweaks purport to address the sometimes fuzzy value [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><st1:country-region w:st="on"></st1:country-region><img src="http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/media_header.gif" title="y" alt="y" align="left" height="39" hspace="10" width="386" />Lawyers quip about “selling the other party a vest with no arms,” which means ceding the opposition a settlement solution which sounds accommodating but gives up little.</p>
<p>Yesterday’s <a href="http://help.yahoo.com/help/l/us/yahoo/ysm/sps/faqs/qbp/qbp_faqs.html">Yahoo Search Marketing</a> announcement regarding discounted PPC click-throughs for low value traffic could be just that. The source quality tweaks purport to address the sometimes fuzzy value of PPC traffic and may impact the cost, ROI, and tactics PPC managers employ for paid search on the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Panama</st1:place></st1:country-region> advertising platform. I’m leery and wonder what exactly Yahoo just gave us. It sounds like more PR from a  first tier  PPC engine which understands the perception of rampant  click fraud  is partially true.<!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Source Quality</strong><br />
In an “attempt” to consider the “quality” of partner-site source traffic when an advertiser is charged for Content Match and Sponsored Search click-throughs, Yahoo “may” discount the amount charged for such clicks based on a black-box traffic source quality algorithm. Many advertisers do not use <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Panama</st1:place></st1:country-region> Content Match because of the sometimes dubious quality and high cost of clicks such as these.</p>
<p>The salient fact here is that Yahoo is admitting by proxy that sometimes Content Match and Sponsored Search traffic is tainted enough that they feel the need to attempt evaluation and lower the cost for less-valuable clicks.</p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left">“The traffic quality from our partner websites is calculated based on conversion rates and other measurements of the ability to deliver quality traffic.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->What the heck does that mean? <span>There</span> is nothing in the program as of yet to monitor what MY conversion rate is or how useful the traffic is to our clients. Yahoo does not reveal the criteria by which they grade the quality of the traffic except to state that the “overall quality of the traffic source” is considered when &#8220;warranted.&#8221; <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Another Black Box</strong><br />
There is no transparency whatsoever in the process. Yahoo won’t report specific information on discounts received, does not publish a list of discounted publishers or URL’s, and does not presently provide opt-out capabilities for particular sources of traffic. <span id="more-167"></span>According to Yahoo some of these features may be coming later in 2007. Essentially Yahoo just told us to trust that they know when traffic is bad and we won&#8217;t be charged as much. Stay tuned to see if the fixes actually impact the bottom line in terms of conversion rate and/or cost.</p>
<p>Here are some blog buzz posts regarding this announcement:<br />
<a href="http://www.i4u.com/article9337.html">Yahoo Panama Ads charge by Quality of Ad&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/yahoo_publisher_network/3358610.htm">Yahoo Panama Ads Charge by Quality of Ad&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://www.azul7.com/blog/sem/the-chicken-or-the-egg-yahoo-rolls-out-quality-pricing">The Chicken or the Egg? Yahoo Rolls Out Quality&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://www.demand-marketing.com/blog/2007/06/yahoo-panama-quality-based-pricing.html">Yahoo! Panama Quality Based Pricing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/06/05/panama-content-match-source-quality-tweaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Yahoo Filter SERPs for Social Media Criticizing Yahoo?</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/04/19/does-yahoo-filter-serps-for-social-media-criticizing-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/04/19/does-yahoo-filter-serps-for-social-media-criticizing-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marty Weintraub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/04/19/does-yahoo-filter-serps-for-social-media-criticizing-yahoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Yahoo organic search results honest when it comes to social media criticizing Yahoo? We’ll ask the question in SERP screen captures. On April 5th we posted an article critical of Yahoo Small Business Hosting to the Search Engine Watch Forum (Alexa 1342 with significant page rank). The post was in regard to a difficult [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Yahoo organic search results honest when it comes to social media criticizing Yahoo? We’ll ask the question in SERP screen captures.</p>
<p>On April 5th we posted an article critical of <a href="http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=17020" title="SEW Post Yahoo Small Business Hosting">Yahoo Small Business Hosting </a>to the <a href="http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/" title="SEW Forum">Search Engine Watch Forum</a> (Alexa 1342 with significant page rank). The post was in regard to a difficult domain registrar situation aimClear was experiencing.  Within a week the post attained the organic #3 result in Google for the keyphrase “Yahoo Small Business Hosting.” The post is not indexed in Yahoo&#8217;s top 100 results. Here is a screen capture of today&#8217;s Google SERP. Yes, we’ve turned Google personalized search OFF.<a href="http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/google-sbh-results.jpg" title="Google-SERP"><img src="http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/google-sbh-results.jpg" alt="Google-SERP" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-72"></span>In contrast here is today’s SERP on Yahoo for “Yahoo Small Business Hosting.” The SEW post does not appear anywhere on the first page. In fact the SEW post does not appear in the first 100 organic search results. Where is it?<a href="http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/yahoo-sbh-results.jpg" title="Yahoo-SERP"><img src="http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/yahoo-sbh-results.jpg" alt="Yahoo-SERP" /></a></p>
<p>This is a significant difference between Yahoo and Google’s SERPs for the keyphrase. I suppose we can chalk it up to differences between the Google and Yahoo algorithms. Given Yahoo’s support for the evolution of social media, today’s algorithmic differences in the SERPs for “Yahoo Small Business Hosting” are a surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2007/04/19/does-yahoo-filter-serps-for-social-media-criticizing-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

