<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aimClear® Search Marketing Blog &#187; Intigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aimclearblog.com/category/intigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com</link>
	<description>Online marketing blog for advertising agency, in-house &#38; PR professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Evolve or Die! Next Gen. Business Models at SES</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/03/25/evolve-or-die-next-gen-business-models-at-ses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/03/25/evolve-or-die-next-gen-business-models-at-ses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Provost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today at SearchEngineStrategies New York, a panel of industry experts presented new revenue opportunities for publishers. This  group outlined various business models that are gaining traction and explained how old tried and true business models continue to evolve in the marketplace due to the needs of clients and the economy. Publishers &#38; Agencies: New Business Models [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="SES" src="http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/brooklyn-bridge-nyc-view.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="181" /></p>
<p>Today at <strong>SearchEngineStrategies New York</strong>, a panel of industry experts presented new revenue opportunities for publishers. This  group outlined various business models that are gaining traction and explained how old tried and true business models continue to evolve in the marketplace due to the needs of clients and the economy.</p>
<p>Publishers &amp; Agencies: New Business Models for Changing Times&#8221; was moderated Greg Jarboe, President &amp; Co-Founder, SEO-PR. The speakers were Erik Matlick, CEO, Madison Logic, Mark M. Edmiston, Managing Director, AdMedia Partners, Gill Torren, Associate Publisher, SC Magazine, Haymarket Media, Inc. and Murray Gaylord, Vice President, Marketing and Customer Insights, NYTimes.</p>
<p>They spoke about the immediate challenges and opportunities facing the marketing industry today. All 4 presenters touched on the evolution of traditional offline marketing strategies into integrated offline/online campaigns. <span id="more-1771"></span></p>
<p><strong>Mark Edmiston: </strong>Evolution at Web Speed</p>
<p>• Where are we and where do we go? It is becoming increasingly difficult to monetize visitors through 3rd party online advertising models.<br />
•  It is not just the recession. Web marketing is not an efficient CPM platform. CPM based revenue will continue its fall in price and units.<br />
• Web marketing is highly effective as a direct response model/platform. Performance based ads topped 61% in 2007 and is still growing.<br />
• Secular trends are the driving force behind the changes. Add campaign efficiencies, accountability and trackability help to define specific ROI and are critical across all forms of media (offline/online).<br />
• Ecommerce models are replacing Bricks and mortar models. This change parallels the growth in broadband.<br />
• Performance based advertising  (PBA) supports e commerce sites. Like a hand in glove. PBA will continue to gain considerable share of the marketing landscape.</p>
<p>In 15 years Search has gone from “good luck finding anything” to “finding everything”. Too much is too much. It is really easy to get lost in the noise.</p>
<p>• General Search growth has slowed considerably.<br />
• Precision/targeted search is taking the lead (Google behavioral targeting)<br />
• Consolidation will become more prevalent. Microsoft/Yahoo.</p>
<p>Where do we go from here?</p>
<p>• Move up the sales cycle. Get closer to consumers the buying decision.<br />
• Increase utility for the user. Stronger and deeper engagements will present a stronger post click experience and develop longer retail relationships.<br />
• Develop multiple monetization option. CPC, CPA and even…..CPM (it will still have a place at the table).</p>
<p>Next up was <strong>Murray Gaylord</strong>. He took the audience on a quick trip down memory lane as we entered the advertising world of 1966.  The Media landscape was simple with few choices (Broadcast TV, Radio, Newspaper and Billboards).</p>
<p>Speed ahead 20 years to 1986 and the landscape had changed dramatically, the choices had quadrupled with inclusion of digital media.  The power still rested in the hands of the advertisers…although a bit tenuous….now 20 years further into the future and 2009 is a new animal that requires new approaches. This is the age of “My media”.</p>
<p>Users have become:<br />
• Creator<br />
• Distributor<br />
• Programmer</p>
<p>Consumers are turning to each other to tune out the noise.</p>
<p>• Social networks are greatly affecting the direction that marketers are going with their campaigns and messaging. (Facebook, Twitter, blogospheres)<br />
• The old Marketing 101 has changed with the evolution of a new sales funnel. There is no longer one straight tube into the funnel. It is now a multi-tubed creation born out of a Dr. Seuss story.</p>
<p>Mr. Gaylord offered up a case study of the New York Times as an example of how they are currently engaging the integration of online methodology into their offline universe.</p>
<p>The strategy is simple…Attract new users through new topical applications and engage current users at a deeper level.</p>
<p>• Employ competitive advanced web features. Videos, blogs, multi media and interactive elements<br />
• Forge strong partnerships with well known and high traffic social media sites. (Twitter and Facebook).<br />
• Integrate offline and online campaigns as much as possible<br />
• Use social media in concert with there SEM and SEO strategies<br />
• Utilize event based CTA’s that are brand relevant and of value to the consumer base.<br />
• Ask the consumers to do something. Post-click engagement. Go deeper.</p>
<p><strong>Erik Matlick</strong> took the lead on the topic of lead generation.<br />
• Marketers main priority for 2009 is achieving a measurable ROI.<br />
• There has been a pricing model shift. Performance advertising is on the rise and CPM advertising is on the decline.<br />
• Search is leveling out. There are only so many searches you can do. It is reaching critical mass.<br />
• Display advertising is in decline.<br />
• Lead generation, although only a small piece of the pie currently, is growing dramatically.</p>
<p>Why is search successful? Because it is centered around the consumer.</p>
<p>• Ease of use<br />
• Single point of entry (google)<br />
• Lees time to manage (In comparison to traditional offline models). Better ROI.<br />
• Critical reach<br />
• Market driven. Immediacy.<br />
• Standards in ads. (google)</p>
<p>There are certain challenges in Lead Generation, namely the fragmentation (scale, pricing, quality, standards).</p>
<p>The future of lead generation is strong. “Advertisers use one platform to generate the most qualified leads on the best blockbuster brands and long-tail traffic”.  It is the most focused and targeted model available.</p>
<p>Last but not least was Gill Torren. He presented a case study of how his firm utilizes web marketing models in different capacities in concert with their existing offline base.</p>
<p>• Lead Generation media. Webcast series, Virtual conferences, expo series, White paper directories.<br />
• They created gated premium content to go deeper with existing clients and sponsors.  Created value in premium content and sponsorship opportunities.<br />
• Sponsors gained access to the most important leads.<br />
• White paper directory to leverage advertiser contact. Cost per lead campaigns at a low entry point. Leveraged advertiser created content</p>
<p><strong>In conclusion:</strong><br />
In a challenging market publishers need to increase value to advertisers by bringing them closer to the sale. Create trade programs that coexist with traditional media and choose your tech partners carefully. I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/03/25/evolve-or-die-next-gen-business-models-at-ses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lead a Horse To Water: The State of Integration</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2008/12/09/lead-a-horse-to-water-the-state-of-integration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2008/12/09/lead-a-horse-to-water-the-state-of-integration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Provost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searchenginestrategies chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SES Chicago]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Distinguished SearchEngineStrategies Chicago &#8220;Orion panel&#8221; chose to tackle one of the big questions at the top of almost every serious advertiser&#8217;s list. &#8220;What is the best way to approach &#8220;Integrated&#8221; marketing strategies in the current economic environments and beyond?&#8221; Today&#8217;s moderator was Kevin Ryan, SES Advisory Board Chair &#38; CEO Motivity Marketing. The panel wasted no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; float: left;" src="http://aimclearblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/heartlight.jpg" alt="heartlight" width="144" height="89" />The Distinguished SearchEngineStrategies Chicago &#8220;Orion panel&#8221; chose to tackle one of the big questions at the top of almost every serious advertiser&#8217;s list. &#8220;What is the best way to approach &#8220;Integrated&#8221; marketing strategies in the current economic environments and beyond?&#8221;</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s moderator was Kevin Ryan, SES Advisory Board Chair &amp; CEO Motivity Marketing. The panel wasted no time by jumping into the fray and asking hard questions. &#8220;Is integration really happening?&#8221; and  &#8220;How do marketers go beyond the pitch and to the reality of what that means in today&#8217;s environment?&#8221;<span id="more-1009"></span></p>
<p>The Panel consisted of Andrew Goodman Principal, Page Zero Media<br />
Robert Murray, President, IProspect<br />
Aaron Goldman VP Marketing &amp; Strategic Partnerships, Resolution Media<br />
Josh Todd, Director of Aquisition Marketing, Constant Contact<br />
Gregg Stewart, Senior Vice President, Interactive, TMP Directional Marketing</p>
<p>According to the panel. 80% of businesses today don&#8217;t understand what constitutes integration. Marketing agencies and interactive media representatives face a steep client learning curve in preparing businesses for not only the discussion but the execution of integrated marketing campaigns. This is in light of the fact that only 5% of retail conversions happen online , which means 95% of product and service purchases still happen in a bricks and mortar scenario. While search has experienced much growth, it is not a stand alone and thus can be greatly enhanced with integrated techniques.</p>
<p>On the surface it&#8217;s simple.  Integration means, how do you glue the offline world to the online world.  How do you turn advertising into cash when people get in way.  Traditional Media metrics still hold sway over and frame client expectations.</p>
<p>At the present time the comparison is not apples to apples. Traditional Media platforms lack the trackability and analytics of Search Platforms, which makes it almost impossible to confirm conversion as  relates to ROI. Of course this is ultimately required to validate the approach to spending across multiple advertising platforms. Managing client expectations is key.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;You have Search clients and you have Traditional media clients. Integration has yet to take a firm hold. There are few &#8220;Tweaners&#8221;.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Being a cable television executive, a few interesting comments really struck a chord with me. Robert Murry pointed out that (according to his research) &#8220;only 55% of businesses with a primary search campaign strategy actually coordinate their campaigns with offline marketing strategies, even though 2/3 of consumers polled claim they were driven to an online search from an offline marketing message (resulting in a 39% conversion/purchase rate).&#8221; The driving factors of why clients resist integration vary from budget constraints to resources to &#8220;just not considering it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Consistent messaging across all platforms, utilized during a campaign, is key. 24% of Clients who did utilize multi-platform support integrated their online keyword strategy through offline creative and so created consistent and cohesive messaging. Josh Todd specifically pointed out the need to Integrate through creative cycles. ROBO (Research Online Buy Offline ) is fast becoming an established consumer trait.</p>
<p>Aaron Goldman made an excellent point about how clients need to first own one underlying platform and then move into the process of integrated strategies. He also touched on the need to have everyone on the same page.  As he put it, &#8221; Incent your agencies towards a common goal.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is a &#8220;team game&#8221; so Integrate search research &#8211; use it to target offline media, share online keywords and messaging with offline people. There is no room for being territorial. Client centered strategies are selfless.</p>
<p>All panelists agreed that &#8220;True integration is driven by relationships with the client&#8221;. The client has to be committed long term and it is imperative that the Media reps are prepared to justify and quantify results (or lack thereof).</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Patience is key. Education is critical. Post search activity and follow up is vital to staying on top of the game and adjusting strategy. </em>Integrated data will be imperfect until the traditional media platforms are more trackable, in the same manner as search.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This was a solid session with good information, presented by savvy search marketers.  Speaking for my cable industry associates, next year we&#8217;ll be pitching SearchEngineStrategies Chicago from the traditional media side, to add perspective to the discussion. Let&#8217;s work together in the halls of our industrys&#8217; respective conferences <img src='http://www.aimclearblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2008/12/09/lead-a-horse-to-water-the-state-of-integration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

