<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is What&#8217;s Good For Google Good For SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/</link>
	<description>A search marketing blog for advertising agency, in-house &#38; PR professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:36:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 还在用nofollow做SEO？Google说不行了！ &#124; SEM WATCH</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-8841</link>
		<dc:creator>还在用nofollow做SEO？Google说不行了！ &#124; SEM WATCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-8841</guid>
		<description>[...] 关于Google对nofollow的调整，还可以延伸阅读：1、2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 关于Google对nofollow的调整，还可以延伸阅读：1、2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Google Profiles SEO&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-7970</link>
		<dc:creator>How Google Profiles SEO&#8217;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-7970</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Cutts feelings on this be sure to read You and A with Matt Cutts from Outspoken Media, Aim Clear, and SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Cutts feelings on this be sure to read You and A with Matt Cutts from Outspoken Media, Aim Clear, and SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the new google rel-nofollow policy means for squidoo : Squidoo tips</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-7921</link>
		<dc:creator>What the new google rel-nofollow policy means for squidoo : Squidoo tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-7921</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s a new rel-nofollow policy out. Where it used to be that pagerank got distributed around all the followed links on a page, now it gets distributed around all the links on the page and what&#8217;s on rel-nofollow links just &#8216;evaporates&#8217; as Matt Cuts puts it in the interview I linked to above. Matt Cuts is THE google SEO spokesperson, so what he says is generally to be taken seriously. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s a new rel-nofollow policy out. Where it used to be that pagerank got distributed around all the followed links on a page, now it gets distributed around all the links on the page and what&#8217;s on rel-nofollow links just &#8216;evaporates&#8217; as Matt Cuts puts it in the interview I linked to above. Matt Cuts is THE google SEO spokesperson, so what he says is generally to be taken seriously. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WP Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; rel=nofollow is not working - Wordpress for Internet and Affiliate Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-7515</link>
		<dc:creator>WP Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; rel=nofollow is not working - Wordpress for Internet and Affiliate Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-7515</guid>
		<description>[...] As I browse websites, I found this blog article dated Jun 16&#160; about nofollow no longer works to affect or to sculpt Page Ranks. Whether you use nofollow or not, all the links are being processed equally from one year ago.  About 2 weeks ago Danny Sullivan highlighted that Google follows Javascript links, and that sculpting PageRank using rel=nofollow no longer works. Matt Cutts shared that second bit to the shock and awe of the SEO industry at the recent SMX conference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I browse websites, I found this blog article dated Jun 16&#160; about nofollow no longer works to affect or to sculpt Page Ranks. Whether you use nofollow or not, all the links are being processed equally from one year ago.  About 2 weeks ago Danny Sullivan highlighted that Google follows Javascript links, and that sculpting PageRank using rel=nofollow no longer works. Matt Cutts shared that second bit to the shock and awe of the SEO industry at the recent SMX conference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expert SEO Testing: Usually Worthless - Drew Jones &#124; Internet Entrepreneur</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>Expert SEO Testing: Usually Worthless - Drew Jones &#124; Internet Entrepreneur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>[...] About 2 weeks ago Danny Sullivan highlighted that Google follows Javascript links, and that sculpting PageRank using rel=nofollow no longer works. Matt Cutts shared that second bit to the shock and awe of the SEO industry at the recent SMX conference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About 2 weeks ago Danny Sullivan highlighted that Google follows Javascript links, and that sculpting PageRank using rel=nofollow no longer works. Matt Cutts shared that second bit to the shock and awe of the SEO industry at the recent SMX conference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts is a really nice guy but&#8230; &#124; SEO Services</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-6920</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts is a really nice guy but&#8230; &#124; SEO Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-6920</guid>
		<description>[...] has given us hints that he can&#8217;t tell us all we want to know, in this statement he made on AimClear Blog: It’s sort of like the credit card companies, you can’t really tell all the penalties you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has given us hints that he can&#8217;t tell us all we want to know, in this statement he made on AimClear Blog: It’s sort of like the credit card companies, you can’t really tell all the penalties you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Google Profiles SEO’s &#124; feed hat blog</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-6900</link>
		<dc:creator>How Google Profiles SEO’s &#124; feed hat blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-6900</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Cutts feelings on this be sure to read You and A with Matt Cutts from Outspoken Media, Aim Clear, and SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Cutts feelings on this be sure to read You and A with Matt Cutts from Outspoken Media, Aim Clear, and SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pagerank is Dead. Sculpting is Dead. Trust is Alive&#8230;.in my eyes.</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-6881</link>
		<dc:creator>Pagerank is Dead. Sculpting is Dead. Trust is Alive&#8230;.in my eyes.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-6881</guid>
		<description>[...] Google passing value a different way than this old formula on internal links can be found from the Aimclearblog coverage of Danny&#8217;s Q and A with Matt at SMX: Matt: If you have 10 links and 5 are nofollow, there is this assumption that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google passing value a different way than this old formula on internal links can be found from the Aimclearblog coverage of Danny&#8217;s Q and A with Matt at SMX: Matt: If you have 10 links and 5 are nofollow, there is this assumption that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funkadelic_ (Christian Ludwig)</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-6869</link>
		<dc:creator>Funkadelic_ (Christian Ludwig)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-6869</guid>
		<description>via &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/cemper&quot;&gt;@cemper&lt;/a&gt; RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/cassy82&quot;&gt;@cassy82&lt;/a&gt; Interesting conversation between &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/dannysullivan&quot;&gt;@dannysullivan&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/mattcutts&quot;&gt;@mattcutts&lt;/a&gt; at SMX -&gt; http://tinyurl.com/o2bmls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/cemper">@cemper</a> RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/cassy82">@cassy82</a> Interesting conversation between <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/dannysullivan">@dannysullivan</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/mattcutts">@mattcutts</a> at SMX -> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/o2bmls" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/o2bmls</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.aimclearblog.com/2009/06/03/is-whats-good-for-google-good-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-6865</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aimclearblog.com/?p=2863#comment-6865</guid>
		<description>@Michael Martinez – I thought that channeling the FTC’s official language was a bit heavy-handed, not exactly appropriate for a search marketing conference . And I agree with you that nofollow is not as good as  disclosure to the average consumer

@internet strategist – That’s funny that you said that, my original sentence was not as civil.

@seoAware you’ve very welcome, expect more SMX advanced coverage to trickle in over the next week, this conference was pouring serious and cool content

@deeho Great points, as has been said before “how genius is it of google to get SEO’s to do their work for them”

@mich d. – Michael Gray just published an awesome post that expands on this piece.

@john Sullivan – I’ll have to talk to Marty about that one

@nick stamoulis –That&#039;s a great thing to keep in mind, but believe it or not, there was life before google and many people had thriving careers  in this industry. Whether you enjoy their search, services or appreciate their philanthropic goals,  there’s nothing wrong with holding Google to a higher standard.

@Matt Aird – I found your interpretation thoughtful and entertaining, thanks for adding to this discussion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Martinez – I thought that channeling the FTC’s official language was a bit heavy-handed, not exactly appropriate for a search marketing conference . And I agree with you that nofollow is not as good as  disclosure to the average consumer</p>
<p>@internet strategist – That’s funny that you said that, my original sentence was not as civil.</p>
<p>@seoAware you’ve very welcome, expect more SMX advanced coverage to trickle in over the next week, this conference was pouring serious and cool content</p>
<p>@deeho Great points, as has been said before “how genius is it of google to get SEO’s to do their work for them”</p>
<p>@mich d. – Michael Gray just published an awesome post that expands on this piece.</p>
<p>@john Sullivan – I’ll have to talk to Marty about that one</p>
<p>@nick stamoulis –That&#8217;s a great thing to keep in mind, but believe it or not, there was life before google and many people had thriving careers  in this industry. Whether you enjoy their search, services or appreciate their philanthropic goals,  there’s nothing wrong with holding Google to a higher standard.</p>
<p>@Matt Aird – I found your interpretation thoughtful and entertaining, thanks for adding to this discussion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
